It's POV and a form of advocacy which is warned against. However "to boycott the media offerings wherein fill in the blank appear" is a bad reason to have a list. I don't like Scientology and I think it's harmful. That's the kind of talk that'd make me consider putting this on delete. Something tells me that the same wonderment at exposing Scientology members would not be applied to, say, Ku Klux Klan members. But, when an organized group persecutes those disagreeing with them (shades of the Spanish Inquisition) then all bets are off when it comes to anonymizing the members of such a group. Personally, I don't care if folks wanna' believe that ancient alien spirits inhabit our personna leading to ill effects.
![the gossip junkie nadel the gossip junkie nadel](https://gossip.thedirty.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/IMG_20161114_225520-482x510.jpg)
A web search will reveal a lengthy list of attrocities committed against non-Scientologists for anything the Scientologists disagree with. One possible purpose is to boycott the media offerings wherein Scientologists appear.
![the gossip junkie nadel the gossip junkie nadel](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/05/a0/44/05a04408b334a376012dcedac03b7ad0.png)
Presently anyone from anywhere on the planet can change this article gross or subtile and then any newspaper can snapshot the page. Terryeo 17:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC) This page scares me. Why would wikipedia want to list living Scientologists? Would you want your religious faith proclaimed to the world without your consent? Doesn't seem right to me.
![the gossip junkie nadel the gossip junkie nadel](https://www.gossipfashionstore.nl/pimages/cache/476060065_2.crop-663-750.jpg)